友吉智汇YouJi Nexus
全球具身智能与低空应用场景落地引擎
 EN

场景方案蓝图

六项场景方向：印尼与欧洲任务研究，以及水上智能装备

用统一模板沉淀「可讨论、可验证、可复制」的场景方案蓝图。六项方向分别标注当前类型：BP-01至BP-05五份条目在获得 L2 需求确认前为参考蓝图；水上智能装备方向的SP-01条目为方案征集——来自行业知识与公开证据，未对应已验证需求方。

蓝图类型：参考蓝图 / 项目蓝图 / 案例蓝图 / 复制蓝图。公开页面显示类型；参考蓝图不构成已确认需求、已签约项目或已验收结果的叙事。

升级机制：对应需求达到 L2（接触确认）后，参考蓝图升级为项目蓝图，并分别生成内部完整版与公开脱敏版。

披露纪律：公开蓝图与场景机会共同受「每次最多 2 条脱敏商机信息」纪律约束；蓝图页不用于绕过商机披露上限。

本页不含：企业可识别信息、联系方式、预算与合同金额、价格数字；第⑦节仅提供成本构成与计算口径。

国内 / 海外双向复制说明

六项场景方向使用相同模板，通过「地区交付条件」体现差异；平台不为单一国家单独建设另一套平台。

  • 每份蓝图第②节均区分「印尼地区条件」与「国内对标」：国内优先寻找与印尼高优先级场景同构的项目，用于先行验证工况与方案假设。
  • 复制路径：国内对标场景验证 → 结论回填蓝图 → 向印尼复制；海外验证成功的方案同样反向引入国内场景池。
  • 90 天目标（经营验证口径）：建立国内对标场景池，并形成至少 1 个可与印尼双向复制的蓝图。
  • 选题说明：六项场景方向中，BP-01至BP-05来自印尼展后反馈评分与欧洲公开需求梳理；水上智能装备方向的SP-01为方案征集，待形成明确任务、采购主体、工况与交付条件后，按同一模板升级为需求蓝图。
  • 延伸：想把这些参考蓝图推进为真实考察？了解企业调研、科技场景考察与对接计划（候选主题示例，非已确认行程；接待与展示以书面确认为准）。

六项场景蓝图 · 方法总览

六项场景蓝图方法示意（视频为方法演示，不构成已交付项目实拍）。视频画面含中文字；各蓝图任务拆解见下方列表与 《六项场景蓝图详解》。

视频内容摘要：本视频以「从任务拆解到验证路径」为主线，总览六项场景蓝图——矿山综合安全、危险区域无人巡检、自然灾害与突发火灾救援、岛际及偏远地区低空运输、欧洲高门槛具身智能应用、近岸与港区智能作业（海洋场景特别蓝图）。每个方向演示四步工作法：采集现场风险、汇聚并传回数据、识别异常并告警、现场复核与闭环，并列出协同产品与参与供应链类型。画面为 AI 场景示意，具体需求、作业授权、预算与合作条件以实际核验为准，不构成已交付项目实拍。

蓝图一 · BP-01

矿山综合安全

参考蓝图

主题范围：高风险区域巡检 · 气体与热异常监测 · 夜间照明 · 应急响应先导侦察

①场景问题与当前方式
  • 矿区高风险区域（边坡、采空区周边、尾矿设施、地下巷道）传统上依赖人工定时巡检：人员需进入存在粉尘、有害气体、高温与坍塌坠物风险的环境；夜间与偏远矿段照明不足，异常发现滞后。
  • 气体与热异常多依赖便携检测仪人工读取，连续性差、留档难；夜间应急响应链条长，先导侦察手段有限。
  • 核心矛盾：人员暴露风险与巡检覆盖频次之间的取舍——提高频次即提高暴露。
②行业、任务、工况和地区
  • 行业：矿业（露天矿、地下矿、选矿与尾矿设施）。
  • 任务：高风险区域例行巡检、气体与热异常连续监测、夜间照明保障、应急响应先导侦察。
  • 工况：高温高湿、粉尘、腐蚀性气氛、弱照明或无照明、地下无卫星定位信号、局部可能存在爆炸性气体环境（需防爆核验）。
  • 地区：印尼主要矿区带（泛化表述，不指向特定企业或矿区）；国内对标：矿山智能化与少人化政策推动区域，用于先行验证同构工况。
③目标指标与业务价值
  • 高风险区域由人工抽检升级为例行无人覆盖；单次巡检耗时下降；异常（气体超限、热异常）从发现到告警的时延缩短至分钟级；人员进入危险区域的频次下降。
  • 业务价值：降低人员暴露与安全事故概率；减少非计划停产；巡检记录数字化留档，支撑合规与保险核验。
④推荐方案组成及备选路径
  • 主路径：防尘/防爆巡检机器人（轮式或四足）＋ 气体传感模组 ＋ 红外热成像 ＋ 补光云台 ＋ 现场边缘计算网关 ＋ 巡检管理软件平台；夜间与应急场景增配照明无人机或移动照明装置。
  • 备选路径：露天大范围区域用「固定式气体/热监测点位 ＋ 无人机定期航测」组合；地下巷道可用挂轨或轨道式巡检；通信薄弱区段加装自组网中继。
⑤产品和本地交付要求
  • 产品：防护等级满足粉尘与淋水环境；适用区域的防爆认证；续航满足班次巡检；热成像测温精度满足异常判别；失联自主返回等失效安全配置。
  • 印尼本地交付：设备进口认证与注册；本地注册主体或授权代理参与合同与售后；印尼语培训与文档；矿区电力与通信条件评估；雨季物流与现场工期预留。
⑥PoC 范围、周期和验收指标
  • 范围：选取 1 个矿区的 1–2 条高风险巡检路线（地面或地下一段），覆盖例行巡检、气体/热异常告警、夜间照明与应急先导流程。
  • 周期：建议 4–8 周（含进场安装、参数标定与试运行）。
  • 验收指标（示例口径，最终以双方签署的范围说明书为准）：路线覆盖率、巡检节拍、气体超限告警时延与准确率、热异常告警误报率、设备可利用率、数据上报完整率。
⑦成本构成与 ROI 计算口径
  • 成本构成：设备与载荷（机器人/无人机/气体与热成像传感/移动照明）、集成与安装、通信与边缘设施、本地服务（安装调试、培训、运维）、备件与耗材、软件平台。
  • ROI 口径：年度收益 = 人工巡检人力节约 ＋ 事故与非计划停产损失下降的折算 ＋ 合规与保险成本优化；投资回收期 =（一次性投入 ＋ 年度运维成本）÷（年度收益）。
  • 本页不提供任何价格与金额数字；具体金额以 PoC 范围说明书与正式报价文件为准。
⑧认证、数据、安全和现场风险
  • 认证：适用区域防爆认证、无线设备当地入网要求、当地电气与计量安全标准逐项核验。
  • 数据：巡检影像与传感数据归需求方所有；现场数据本地存储优先，跨境传输需合规评估；对外展示一律脱敏。
  • 安全：机器人进入受限区域需与作业许可制度联动；设备需具备失效自主返回能力。
  • 现场风险：雨季道路与场地条件、粉尘对传感器窗口的污染、地下通信盲区、当地电力波动。
⑨失败条件与停止条件
  • 失败条件：验收指标连续两轮未达约定下限且无改进路径；设备可利用率低于约定阈值；数据链路长期不稳定。
  • 停止条件：现场工况超出设备安全边界（如气体浓度超出设备适用范围）立即停止；安全风险不可控时撤出设备并复盘。
⑩下一步行动和适用边界
  • 下一步：需求方提供巡检路线与工况资料 → 平台组织方案初筛与设备选型 → 签署 PoC 范围说明书与验收标准 → 进场执行。
  • 适用边界：适用于矿业高风险区域例行巡检与应急先导侦察；不适用于未经工况核验的爆破作业面即时替代；不构成任何已确认需求的承诺。
  • 升级条件：需求达到 L2 后升级为项目蓝图。
⑪来源、核验日期和授权状态
来源行业知识与公开证据（矿山安全公开监管要求、矿山智能化公开行业实践）；内部调研（工业热成像与智能巡检场景调研）。 核验日期2026-08-15（内部调研核验）；2026-08-30（蓝图结构定稿）。 授权状态不适用——参考蓝图来自行业知识与公开证据，未对应已验证需求方，不含企业可识别信息。
蓝图二 · BP-02

危险区域无人巡检

参考蓝图

主题范围：危化 · 电池 · 仓储 · 地下空间 · 工业园区（集中验证载体）｜组合机器人、无人机、传感器、热成像与软件平台

①场景问题与当前方式
  • 危化仓储与生产区、电池产业集群（制造与储能）、大型仓储、地下空间（管廊、地下车库）存在气体泄漏、热失控、火灾早期征兆等风险；当前多为人工定时巡检加固定摄像头，热异常靠人工红外点测，覆盖与连续性不足。
  • 夜间与节假日巡检力量薄弱；多套感知设备数据分散，缺少统一的告警复核与留档流程。
  • 内部调研（2026-08-15）显示：电池集群热失控早期监测与防爆巡检是当前最集中的高价值需求形态之一。
②行业、任务、工况和地区
  • 行业：危化、电池（制造与储能）、物流仓储、地下空间运维、工业园区综合管理。
  • 任务：例行无人巡检、气体与热异常连续监测、表计读取、异常告警与人工复核。
  • 工况：防爆区域（适用等级需逐区核验）、电池热失控风险区、高温高湿、地下无卫星定位、走廊与通道狭窄。
  • 地区：印尼以工业园区作为集中验证载体（泛化表述：不指向特定园区，具体载体在需求确认后确定）；国内对标：化工园区无人化巡检政策验证区域。
③目标指标与业务价值
  • 高风险区域巡检由每班 1–2 次人工升级为按需例行无人巡检；热异常与气体告警时延缩短至分钟级；单条路线人力占用下降。
  • 业务价值：早期发现热失控与泄漏征兆，降低重大事故概率；巡检记录结构化留档，支撑合规与保险核验；多源感知数据统一复核。
④推荐方案组成及备选路径
  • 主路径：防爆巡检机器人（轮式/四足）＋ 挂轨巡检（走廊段）＋ 可见光/红外双光谱 ＋ 气体传感 ＋ 边缘网关 ＋ 巡检管理平台；露天罐区与屋顶区域以无人机组网补充。
  • 备选路径：纯固定点位方案（投入更低但覆盖有限）；「固定＋移动」混合；软件平台先行的分步路径（先接入存量摄像头与传感器，再补移动巡检端）。
⑤产品和本地交付要求
  • 产品：防爆等级与所在区域等级匹配（逐区核验）；防护等级满足现场；充放电位规划；与园区既有消防、门禁系统的只读对接接口。
  • 印尼本地交付：本地注册主体或授权代理参与合同与清关；印尼语培训与文档；雨季与群岛物流周期预留；本地备件库与远程运维通道。
⑥PoC 范围、周期和验收指标
  • 范围：园区内 1–2 个代表性区域（如一段仓储走廊 ＋ 一处电池存储区），覆盖例行巡检、热/气告警、夜间巡检。
  • 周期：建议 4–8 周。
  • 验收指标（示例口径）：路线覆盖率、告警时延、误报率与漏报率（以标定样本计）、设备可利用率、与既有系统对接完成度。
⑦成本构成与 ROI 计算口径
  • 成本构成：设备与载荷、集成安装、通信设施、本地服务、备件耗材、软件平台；固定点位与移动端按比例组合时逐项拆分。
  • ROI 口径：年度收益 = 人力替代节约 ＋ 事故损失下降折算 ＋ 合规与保险优化；投资回收期 =（一次性投入 ＋ 年度运维成本）÷（年度收益）。
  • 本页不提供任何价格与金额数字；具体金额以 PoC 范围说明书与正式报价文件为准。
⑧认证、数据、安全和现场风险
  • 认证：防爆认证（与区域等级匹配）、无线设备当地入网、当地电气安全标准。
  • 数据：视频与传感数据归需求方所有；园区数据本地化优先；对外展示一律脱敏。
  • 安全：设备进入防爆区域前取得作业许可；失效自主归位；与消防系统联动仅限只读，不越权控制。
  • 现场风险：工况等级与设备适用等级不匹配即禁入；人机混行通道需约定通行规则；电池区热失控工况超出设备适用范围时禁止进入。
⑨失败条件与停止条件
  • 失败条件：两轮验收未达约定下限；误报率不可收敛；防爆适配核验不通过。
  • 停止条件：区域等级与设备防爆等级不匹配即停止进入；安全风险不可控即撤出并复盘。
⑩下一步行动和适用边界
  • 下一步：园区方提供区域等级划分与巡检路线 → 方案初筛与防爆核验 → 签署范围说明书与验收标准 → 进场执行。
  • 适用边界：适用于危化、电池、仓储、地下空间与工业园区的例行巡检；不替代法规要求的人工安全职责；不指向任何特定园区或企业。
  • 升级条件：需求达到 L2 后升级为项目蓝图。
⑪来源、核验日期和授权状态
来源行业知识与公开证据（危化与电池安全公开监管要求、防爆巡检公开行业实践）；内部调研（工业热成像与智能巡检场景调研：电池集群热失控早期监测与防爆巡检为高优先级需求形态）。 核验日期2026-08-15（内部调研核验）；2026-08-30（蓝图结构定稿）。 授权状态不适用——参考蓝图来自行业知识与公开证据，未对应已验证需求方，不含企业可识别信息。
蓝图三 · BP-03

自然灾害与突发火灾救援

参考蓝图

主题范围：灾情侦察 · 消防员定位 · 通信中继 · 危险识别 · 照明 · 物资投送

①场景问题与当前方式
  • 地震、洪水、火山与城市火灾等灾害发生后，现场常见通信中断、道路受阻、有毒烟雾与高温环境；当前救援依赖人工侦察，进入现场人员的定位与撤离协同主要靠喊话与经验。
  • 夜间与浓烟环境能见度差；危险区域识别滞后；小件应急物资向孤立点位的投送能力不足。
②行业、任务、工况和地区
  • 行业：应急救援、消防救援、防灾减灾机构、园区与社区应急管理。
  • 任务：灾情侦察、消防员定位、通信中继、危险识别、现场照明、小件物资投送。
  • 工况：高温浓烟、涉水、废墟不平地形、通信中断、夜间作业、强风降雨。
  • 地区：印尼群岛灾害多发区（泛化表述）；国内对标：应急管理体系公开示范场景，用于先行验证装备组合。
③目标指标与业务价值
  • 灾情侦察影像获取时间缩短；进入现场人员的定位与撤离指令触达率提升；现场通信覆盖恢复时间缩短；夜间作业照明覆盖提升。
  • 业务价值：降低救援人员二次伤亡风险；提升黄金救援时间利用率；现场信息统一归口指挥。
④推荐方案组成及备选路径
  • 主路径：侦察无人机（可见光＋热成像）＋ 地面救援机器人（废墟与楼梯越障）＋ 人员定位信标与通信终端 ＋ 系留或自组网通信中继 ＋ 照明无人机/移动照明 ＋ 小件投送无人机 ＋ 指挥软件平台。
  • 备选路径：人工携行侦察＋固定式中继；分阶段路径——先行部署侦察与照明两类装备，再逐步补齐定位与投送能力。
⑤产品和本地交付要求
  • 产品：防护等级与抗风抗雨能力；热成像在烟雾环境的判别能力；电池快换与快速补能；装备便携化与快速展开。
  • 印尼本地交付：与属地应急响应机制对接的授权与流程；本地操作员培训（印尼语）；装备存放与维保点前置；多岛调运预案。
⑥PoC 范围、周期和验收指标
  • 范围：与属地应急单位协商的演练场景（1 次桌面推演 ＋ 1 次实装演练），覆盖侦察、定位、中继、照明、投送五科目中的不少于三项。
  • 周期：建议 2–6 周（以演练窗口为准）。
  • 验收指标（示例口径）：影像回传时延、定位指令触达率、中继覆盖半径与持续时长、照明照度与持续时长、投送精度。
⑦成本构成与 ROI 计算口径
  • 成本构成：装备与载荷、集成与训练、通信与备件、本地服务与维保、软件平台。
  • ROI 口径：收益以风险损失下降与处置效率提升折算（如减少二次伤亡、缩短处置时间）；投资回收期 =（一次性投入 ＋ 年度运维成本）÷（年度折算收益）。
  • 本页不提供任何价格与金额数字；具体金额以演练服务协议与正式报价文件为准。
⑧认证、数据、安全和现场风险
  • 认证：无人机飞行合规（当地空域、登记与飞行许可）、无线设备当地入网。
  • 数据：灾害现场影像涉及个人隐私，公开使用前脱敏；数据归属地指挥方所有。
  • 安全：救援现场以属地指挥为准，装备作业取得现场许可；不占用有人救援通道。
  • 现场风险：恶劣天气禁飞、浓烟对光学传感器的影响、通信频段干扰、起降场地受限。
⑨失败条件与停止条件
  • 失败条件：演练科目连续未达验收下限；装备环境适应性（抗风、防雨、烟雾判别）不满足要求。
  • 停止条件：属地指挥认为影响救援安全立即停止；空域或频段许可未取得不启动。
⑩下一步行动和适用边界
  • 下一步：与属地应急、消防单位在其职责与授权框架内沟通需求 → 演练方案设计 → 签署范围说明书 → 执行与复盘。
  • 适用边界：面向民用应急救援与演练场景，仅限合法授权框架内使用；不承诺替代专业救援力量。
  • 升级条件：需求达到 L2 后升级为项目蓝图。
⑪来源、核验日期和授权状态
来源行业知识与公开证据（公开灾害应对实践、应急装备公开资料）；截至本页发布无内部实地调研支撑，如实标注。 核验日期2026-08-30（蓝图结构定稿与公开证据整理）。 授权状态不适用——参考蓝图来自行业知识与公开证据，未对应已验证需求方，不含企业可识别信息。
蓝图四 · BP-04

岛际及偏远地区低空运输

参考蓝图

主题范围：医疗物资 · 救援装备 · 工业备件 · 通信设备（优先级从高到低）｜首期不含城市消费配送

①场景问题与当前方式
  • 群岛地区岛屿众多，岛际运输依赖轮渡＋陆运＋小型航空器组合，班次与时效受限；小型高价值件（医疗物资、备件）常因等待整船班期而延误。
  • 恶劣天气下航线中断，偏远岛屿末端运输受码头与道路条件限制；现有方式对「小批量、高时效」件型缺少经济解。
②行业、任务、工况和地区
  • 行业：医疗与公共卫生、应急救援、工业运维（矿山与能源站点备件）、通信基础设施运维。
  • 任务：数公斤至数十公斤级中小件点对点低空运输，优先级：医疗物资 ＞ 救援装备 ＞ 工业备件 ＞ 通信设备；不以城市消费配送为首期目标。
  • 工况：海洋性高湿高盐雾、强风与降水、无跑道起降（垂直起降）、通信覆盖不均。
  • 地区：印尼岛际与偏远地区（泛化表述，具体航线以需求确认为准）；国内对标：海岛与山区支线物流公开示范，用于先行验证运行流程。
③目标指标与业务价值
  • 高时效件送达时间较既有方式缩短；天气窗口利用率提升；末端运输中断天数下降；交接完好率保持高位。
  • 业务价值：医疗应急响应能力提升；产线与站点因备件缺货的等待时间缩短；为偏远地区建立可预期的补给节奏。
④推荐方案组成及备选路径
  • 主路径：中长航程垂直起降货运无人机 ＋ 标准化货箱 ＋ 简易起降点 ＋ 任务调度与航迹管理软件 ＋ 气象与空域信息服务。
  • 备选路径：与有人驾驶小型航空器协作的「干—支—末」分段模式；先开一条固定航线试点，再逐步组网；与既有物流网络衔接交接标准。
⑤产品和本地交付要求
  • 产品：机型适航与当地民航合规；载重与航程匹配目标航线；防盐雾防腐；冗余动力与伞降等安全配置；货箱温控（医疗件按需）。
  • 印尼本地交付：民航许可与航线审批（以当地法规为准）；本地运营与维修团队；起降点协调（属地社区与设施方授权）；通信与导航保障。
⑥PoC 范围、周期和验收指标
  • 范围：1 条固定航线（两端点明确、空域可协调），验证装载—起飞—巡航—降落—交接全流程与恶劣天气应对预案。
  • 周期：建议 6–12 周（含审批与气象窗口等待）。
  • 验收指标（示例口径）：准点率、任务成功率、载重与航程达成率、交接完好率、安全事件数（目标为零）。
⑦成本构成与 ROI 计算口径
  • 成本构成：飞行器与货箱、地面起降设施、运营团队与维保、保险与合规、软件与信息服务。
  • ROI 口径：收益以时效提升折算（减少延误损失、缩短停机与缺货等待）＋ 与既有运输方式的成本对比；投资回收期 =（一次性投入 ＋ 年度运维成本）÷（年度折算收益）。
  • 本页不提供任何价格与金额数字；具体金额以试点服务协议与正式报价文件为准。
⑧认证、数据、安全和现场风险
  • 认证：当地民航适航与运行许可、飞行器登记、操作员资质；医疗件运输相关要求逐项核验。
  • 数据：航迹与任务数据按运营方与需求方约定管理；涉及医疗物资的信息按隐私要求处理。
  • 安全：人口密集区避让；恶劣天气停飞标准；货物包装与交接双人核验。
  • 现场风险：气象窗口不确定、空域协调周期长、起降点场地条件限制。
⑨失败条件与停止条件
  • 失败条件：准点率或任务成功率连续未达约定下限；交接完好率不达标。
  • 停止条件：许可未取得不飞行；气象超限即停飞；重大安全问题即终止试点并复盘。
⑩下一步行动和适用边界
  • 下一步：需求方明确候选航线与货物类型 → 空域与起降点初核 → 方案设计 → 签署范围说明书 → 试点运行。
  • 适用边界：首期不含城市消费配送；仅面向民用物流场景；所有飞行以当地民航法规为前提。
  • 升级条件：需求达到 L2 后升级为项目蓝图。
⑪来源、核验日期和授权状态
来源行业知识与公开证据（群岛物流公开资料、低空经济与支线物流公开行业实践）；截至本页发布无内部实地调研支撑，如实标注。 核验日期2026-08-30（蓝图结构定稿与公开证据整理）。 授权状态不适用——参考蓝图来自行业知识与公开证据，未对应已验证需求方，不含企业可识别信息。
蓝图五 · BP-05

欧洲高门槛具身智能应用

参考蓝图

主题范围：仓储物流自动化 · 康养陪伴与安全移乘 · 农业采摘与搬运（三条任务线；公开案例仅作能力参照）

①场景问题与当前方式
  • 欧洲仓储、养老护理与设施农业普遍面临人工成本高、招工难与合规用工压力；高峰班次、夜间与收获窗口期的人力弹性不足，产能波动直接影响履约与收益。
  • 仓储拣选补货依赖人工在货架间长距离行走；护理机构以护理员手工照护为主，辅助移乘环节职业损伤风险突出；农业采摘依赖季节性人工，成熟窗口紧张。
  • 公开案例显示相关机器人在既有设施中已可实际运行；但厂商披露的现场数据不能直接当作新场地的验收指标。
②行业、任务、工况和地区
  • 行业：第三方物流与零售仓储、养老与医疗护理机构、设施农业（高架草莓温室、隧道棚等明确收获窗口的作物）。
  • 任务（三条线）：仓储——料箱取送、拣选补货与跨区搬运；康养——陪伴与轻递送，安全移乘另设高门槛验证；农业——成熟果识别、选择性采摘与装筐搬运。
  • 工况：既有仓库布局与消防动线约束；护理场景隐私保护与人员在场要求；温室高湿、行距与光照差异对识别与作业的干扰。
  • 地区：欧洲（泛化表述，不指向特定国家、企业或场地）；国内对标场景可先行验证同构工况。
③目标指标与业务价值
  • 仓储以「完整订单行」为验收核心：拣选完成率与差错率达标，人工介入与停机下降，峰值班吞吐保持稳定。
  • 康养低接触任务（陪伴、提醒、轻递送）先行，释放护理员的非护理事务；移乘始终以人为主导，目标是降低职业损伤而非替代护理判断。
  • 农业以合格入箱公斤为验收单位，而非名义产量；漏采与人工补摘成本下降。
  • 业务价值：缓解招工难、稳定高峰产能、作业过程数字化留档。
④推荐方案组成及备选路径
  • 仓储：料箱机器人/AMR＋末端执行器与视觉识别＋任务调度与 WES/WMS 对接＋异常人工接管；优先与既有输送系统协同，避免大拆大改。
  • 康养：陪伴/轻递送机器人（语言交互、提醒、递送）先行；移乘设备须支持护理员在场控制流程，并验证异常停机与应急下降能力。
  • 农业：柔性抓手＋机械臂＋移动底盘＋成熟度识别（品种、遮挡、光照、果实损伤）＋装筐与搬运协同。
  • 共同方法：任务卡 → 本地伙伴 → 授权 PoC；先选一条流程做透，不以单台设备速度替代完整订单行验收。
⑤产品和本地交付要求
  • 产品：设备需适配既有设施——仓库消防动线与安全隔离、机构门宽与电梯、农场行距与地况；具备异常停机、失效安全等配置。
  • 软件：与 WMS/WES、护理记录与排班、农场生产管理系统的接口能力；任务日志与人工接管记录完整可查。
  • 本地交付：CE 合格评定文件齐备；本地集成、培训与文档；备件供应与故障响应时效；保险安排。
  • 供应商披露的多场地运行信息仅作能力参照，须由目标场地逐项复核。
⑥PoC 范围、周期和验收指标
  • 仓储：G0 取得库区数据、接口权限、负责人与预算授权；G1 离线模拟与局部流程联调；G2 覆盖正常班与峰值班，周期 8–12 周。
  • 康养：陪伴/轻递送 6–8 周，先模拟患者后限定人群；安全移乘 8–12 周，G2 仅面向获准人群且护理员全程监督。
  • 农业：先取产量、用工与损耗基线；G1 机具适配与模拟采摘，确认安全边界；G2 限定品种与种植行，只在一个收获窗口内作结论（6–10 周）。
  • 验收口径：仓储记完成率、差错、人工介入与真实人员工时；康养记安全事件与人工接管；农业记合格入箱公斤/小时与人工补摘成本。
⑦成本构成与 ROI 计算口径
  • 成本构成：设备与载荷、集成与安装、软件对接、本地人工与培训、保险、备件与耗材、长期许可与维护；PoC 预算按上述分项估算，本页不给金额。
  • ROI 口径（仓储）：回收期由付费工时节约决定——简单回收期=总投入÷年净节约，年净节约=真实减少的付费工时×工时单价−年运维；PoC 费用是否抵扣单独注明。
  • 康养与农业不套同一算法：康养按实际可替代工时谨慎测算，节约有限时回收期显著拉长；农业按合格公斤与每公斤净节约测算，对产量高度敏感。
  • 全部为规划假设而非报价；具体金额以 PoC 范围说明书与正式报价文件为准。
⑧认证、数据、安全和现场风险
  • 认证：仓储与农业核适用机械法规、CE 合格评定路径与风险文件——CE 不是可笼统宣称的单一认证，适用路径依产品用途判断。
  • 医疗：涉及患者移乘或康复预期用途的设备，核 EU MDR 的预期用途、分类与临床证据要求。
  • 数据与 AI：图像、语音与健康数据按 GDPR 核合法处理基础；核 AI Act 适用性与访问权限；AI 不承担护理最终责任。
  • 现场风险：既有设施改造约束、护理人群脆弱性、收获窗口与工期错配、本地服务响应能力。
⑨失败条件与停止条件
  • 失败条件：验收指标连续未达约定下限且无改进路径；安全事件或人工接管频次超阈值；接口或数据链路长期不稳定。
  • 移乘特别条款：出现患者安全风险或护理流程不可适配即行停止，先行撤出设备。
  • 停止条件：现场工况超出设备安全边界立即停止；安全风险不可控时撤出设备并复盘。
⑩下一步行动和适用边界
  • 下一步：分别取得三类书面任务卡——仓库（流程负责人、订单行、WMS 接口与人工成本）、护理机构（适用对象、SOP、数据与临床责任人）、农场（品种、收获窗口、人工基线与维护团队）。
  • 书面任务、预算与场地授权明确后再组建 PoC。
  • 适用边界：本次为方向发布与合作方案征集，不代表欧洲客户已下单；公开案例仅作能力参照，欧洲场地与预算仍待核验。
  • 供应商宣传性回收期（如「一年内回本」）不纳入本蓝图测算；需求达到 L2 后升级为项目蓝图。
⑪来源、核验日期和授权状态
来源企业公开披露与公开报道（欧洲某大型 IT 服务企业仓库运行公开案例、欧盟研究机构养老陪伴机器人实测公开报道、丹麦某大学医院辅助移乘设备公开案例、英国某草莓农场采摘机器人公开案例）。 核验日期2026-09-18。 授权状态公开案例仅作能力参照，不含企业可识别信息；欧洲场地与预算待核验；不构成任何已确认需求的承诺。
特别发布 · SP-01

近岸与港区智能作业（海洋场景特别蓝图）

特别蓝图（方案征集）

主题范围：海面漂浮物清洁（M-A） · 水上遇险辅助救援（M-B） · 港池、景区水域与受控近岸

①场景问题与当前方式
  • 港池、景区水域与近岸的漂浮垃圾多靠人工保洁船定时打捞，发现依赖巡查，覆盖与频次受限；清捞之后的上岸卸载、分类与处置常是闭环瓶颈。
  • 水上遇险响应依赖岸上瞭望与报警，夜间与恶劣天气下发现能力弱；从浮具投送到人员抵达之间的时间差是关键风险。
  • 发布边界：参会/候选方案方≠需求方证明；取得水域、负责人与预算授权后，本蓝图才升级为需求蓝图。
②行业、任务、工况和地区
  • 行业：港口与水域管理、景区与滨水运营、水上安全与救援机构。
  • 任务包：M-A 海面清洁——发现→清捞→上岸分类处置；M-B 水上遇险辅助救援——发现→定位→投送（或接近）→人工接管。
  • 工况：潮汐、风向与航道约束，盐雾环境与防腐防水要求；首期选择港池、景区水域等相对受控近岸；油污、化学品泄漏与开放海域搜救不在首轮范围。
  • 地区：泛化表述，不指向特定水域；国内同类受控水域可用于先行验证。
③目标指标与业务价值
  • M-A：漂浮物发现与覆盖能力提升，清捞作业按称重、分类、处置去向留档，单位作业成本可核算。
  • M-B：从报警到确认、设备到达与人工接管的时间链缩短；AI 只做提示，救援指挥与人工接管始终在场。
  • 价值：保洁与值守人力的定向释放、作业留档支撑合规与保险；救援辅助能力定位为既有救援体系的增强而非替代。
④推荐方案组成及备选路径
  • M-A 方案：水面清洁机器人/无人艇（避碰、失联返航、续航与载荷边界）＋岸基视频或无人机识别＋任务日志；配套码头投放回收、充电与备件保障，以及上岸转运与合规处置。
  • M-B 方案：岸基监测与无人机发现＋遥控救生浮具或水面救援机器人投送/接近＋落水信标、报警与定位等船舶系统；指挥员复核后再派遣。
  • 共用底座：共用水域地图、通信与任务记录；采购方、值守责任与安全指标分别确认。
  • 候选装备脱敏列示：如国内厂商海洋版遥控救生圈（盐雾防腐设计、定位求救功能）与水面救援机器人；海况、遥控范围与认证文件按目标水域逐项复核。
⑤产品和本地交付要求
  • 设备：盐雾防腐与防护等级、通信链路可靠性、失联返航与失控处置为硬性要求；救援类装备认证文件按目标水域逐项核验。
  • 软件：漂浮物识别与分布图、航线与任务日志、人工接管接口；监测预警不能自动判定救援，识别结果须经人工复核。
  • 本地交付：水域进入许可与航道安全规则、码头保障（投放回收、充电、维修）、作业人员与保险、垃圾转运与处置资质。
  • 参会企业按任务提交相似水域案例与分项责任，不默认承担全部能力链。
⑥PoC 范围、周期和验收指标
  • M-A：G0 取得水域、试航、岸上卸载与保险授权；G1 勘测热点与现有保洁费用基线；G2 在 6–8 周内记录约 20 个计划作业日。
  • M-A 验收：覆盖与识别准确率、清捞称重与分类记录、人工工时变化、停航与异常处置。
  • M-B：G0 取得救援指挥权、试航/飞行授权与 SOP；G1 静水假人与浮具演练，核失控处置；G2 在获准水域完成至少 20 次模拟派遣。
  • M-B 验收：目标发现率、误报与定位误差，报警到确认/到达/接管的分段时间，覆盖水域与可用率，失联与恶劣天气退出；真实遇险者不做测试对象。
⑦成本构成与 ROI 计算口径
  • 成本构成：水面平台与载荷、传感与软件、码头保障设施、本地服务（作业人员、保险、维护）、垃圾上岸转运与处置；M-B 另含演练与值守成本。
  • ROI 口径（M-A）：先核实际可取消的现有付费保洁费用而非账面总额——年净节约=真实取消的工时费用−年运维；简单回收期=总投入÷年净节约；PoC 费用是否抵扣单独注明。
  • M-B 不做财务 ROI：不把生命价值折算财务回报；预算按采购、运营与服务费分项判断，安全与响应指标优先。
  • 本页不提供任何价格与金额数字；具体金额以 PoC 范围说明书与正式报价为准。
⑧认证、数据、安全和现场风险
  • 认证：无线设备与船舶/无人机的辖区要求逐项核验；救援装备认证文件复核；保险与责任主体可追溯。
  • 数据：水域影像涉及公共空间监控与个人隐私，按当地法规处理；任务日志归需求方所有，对外展示一律脱敏。
  • 安全：M-B 全程救援指挥在场、人员备援——AI 只做提示，机器人不承诺独立救人；油污与化学品污染须另设专业处置方案。
  • 现场风险：恶劣天气与海况窗口、航道冲突、通信盲区、设备腐蚀与生物附着。
⑨失败条件与停止条件
  • 失败条件：识别与清捞指标连续未达约定下限；设备可用率低、失联返航失败频发；模拟派遣分段时间无改善。
  • 停止条件：海况或天气超出设备与 SOP 安全边界立即停止；M-B 出现任何人员安全风险即中止并复盘。
  • 范围外即停：任务一旦超出近岸受控水域（开放海域搜救、油污与化学品处置）不在本轮执行。
⑩下一步行动和适用边界
  • 下一步：一水域一任务卡——先锁定一个管理清晰的港池或近岸水域，分别访谈清洁采购方与救援指挥方，拿到基线、授权与预算后确定 PoC 口径。
  • 四方协同：水域管理者（许可与规则）、任务采购者（清洁与救援预算分开核）、当地运营者（维护、保险、值守、处置）、装备联合体（实测、合规、分项费用）。
  • 适用边界：本特别蓝图为方案征集与方向发布，不公布未经确认的海外采购需求；平台组织任务与联合响应，不替代持证运营或救援指挥。
  • 升级条件：取得水域、负责人与预算授权后升级为需求蓝图。
⑪来源、核验日期和授权状态
来源港口方与机构公开披露（欧洲某港漂浮物管理公开案例、里海湾区水面清洁项目公开报道、东南亚某城市河道拦截项目公开复盘、澳洲水上救援机构公开事故记录与海岸监测试验公开报道）。 核验日期2026-09-17。 授权状态公开案例仅作能力参照，不含企业可识别信息；不据此推定任何水域适用；不构成任何已确认需求的承诺。
提交场景需求，讨论蓝图落地路径
免费提交；对应需求达到 L2 后，参考蓝图将升级为项目蓝图并生成公开脱敏版。
本页全部内容基于行业知识与公开证据整理，本页覆盖六项场景方向：BP-01至BP-05标注为「参考蓝图」，水上智能装备方向的SP-01标注为「方案征集」；不含企业可识别信息、联系方式、预算与合同金额、价格数字。蓝图结构与披露纪律遵循平台统一模板（11 节）；地区交付条件以项目双方确认文件为准。

Scenario Solution Blueprints

Six scenario directions: task research in Indonesia and Europe, plus water-based intelligent equipment

One shared template for discussable, verifiable and replicable scenario blueprints. The six directions carry their current type labels: BP-01 to BP-05 are Reference Blueprints until an L2 demand is confirmed; SP-01, within water-based intelligent equipment, is a solution call — built from industry knowledge and public evidence, with no verified demand-side party behind them.

Blueprint types: Reference / Project / Case / Replication. The public page always shows the type; a Reference Blueprint never narrates a confirmed demand, a signed engagement or an accepted result.

Upgrade path: once the related demand reaches L2 (contact confirmed), a Reference Blueprint is upgraded to a Project Blueprint with an internal full version and a public desensitized version.

Disclosure discipline: public blueprints and scenario opportunities jointly follow the rule of "at most 2 desensitized business-opportunity items per disclosure"; blueprint pages are not a way to bypass that limit.

This page contains no: enterprise-identifiable information, contact details, budget or pricing figures; Section 7 of each blueprint lists cost structure and calculation methodology only.

Domestic / Overseas Replication

All six scenario directions share one template; differences are expressed through regional delivery conditions. The platform does not build a separate platform for a single country.

  • Section 2 of every blueprint distinguishes "Indonesia regional conditions" from "domestic benchmark": domestically we first look for projects structurally similar to the high-priority Indonesia scenarios, to validate conditions and solution assumptions in advance.
  • Replication path: validate on the domestic benchmark scenario → feed conclusions back into the blueprint → replicate to Indonesia; solutions proven overseas flow back into the domestic scenario pool as well.
  • 90-day target (business-validation caliber): build a domestic benchmark scenario pool and form at least 1 blueprint that can be replicated both ways with Indonesia.
  • Topic selection: among the six scenario directions, BP-01 to BP-05 come from post-expo feedback scoring in Indonesia and public demand mapping in Europe; SP-01 within water-based intelligent equipment is a solution call, to be upgraded to a demand blueprint once a clear task, purchasing party, working conditions and delivery conditions exist.
  • Next: want to advance these reference blueprints into a real visit? Learn about the Enterprise Research, Tech Scenario Discovery & Business Matching Program (candidate topic examples, not confirmed itineraries; all hosting and demonstrations subject to written confirmation).
BP-01

Integrated Mine Safety

Reference Blueprint

Scope: high-risk area patrol · gas & thermal-anomaly monitoring · night lighting · emergency-response scouting

1Problem & current practice
  • High-risk mining areas (slopes, surroundings of mined-out zones, tailings facilities, underground tunnels) rely on scheduled manual patrols: staff enter environments with dust, toxic gas, heat and rockfall risks; night and remote sections lack lighting and anomalies are found late.
  • Gas and thermal readings are mostly taken manually with portable devices — low continuity, poor records; night emergency response is slow and scouting means are limited.
2Industry, tasks, conditions & region
  • Industry: mining (open-pit, underground, beneficiation and tailings facilities).
  • Tasks: routine patrol of high-risk areas; continuous gas & thermal monitoring; night lighting support; emergency-response scouting.
  • Conditions: heat & humidity, dust, corrosive atmosphere, little or no lighting, no satellite positioning underground, possible explosive-gas zones (to be verified for explosion-proof suitability).
  • Region: main Indonesian mining belts (generic; no specific enterprise or site named); domestic benchmark: regions promoting mine intelligence and reduced staffing, to validate similar conditions first.
3Target metrics & business value
  • Upgrade high-risk-area coverage from sampled manual checks to routine unmanned patrol; shorter patrol time; gas/thermal alarm latency down to minutes; fewer human entries into dangerous zones.
  • Value: lower exposure and accident probability; fewer unplanned stoppages; digitalized, auditable patrol records for compliance and insurance.
4Recommended composition & alternatives
  • Main path: dust-proof/explosion-proof inspection robot (wheeled or quadruped) + gas-sensor modules + infrared thermal imaging + lighting pan-tilt + edge gateway + patrol-management software; lighting drone or mobile lighting for night/emergency use.
  • Alternatives: fixed gas/thermal sensing points plus periodic drone surveys for large open areas; rail-mounted patrol for tunnels; self-organizing network relays where connectivity is weak.
5Product & local delivery requirements
  • Product: ingress protection for dust and water; explosion-proof certification where applicable; battery life matching a shift; thermal accuracy sufficient for anomaly detection; fail-safe autonomous return.
  • Indonesia delivery: import certification and registration; local registered entity or authorized agent for contracting and after-sales; training and documents in Bahasa Indonesia; site power and connectivity assessment; rainy-season logistics buffers.
6PoC scope, duration & acceptance
  • Scope: 1–2 high-risk patrol routes in one mine (surface or one underground section), covering routine patrol, gas/thermal alarms, night lighting and emergency scouting.
  • Duration: 4–8 weeks recommended (including installation, calibration and trial run).
  • Acceptance (example caliber; final per signed scope of work): route coverage, patrol takt, gas-alarm latency and accuracy, thermal false-alarm rate, equipment availability, data-report completeness.
7Cost structure & ROI methodology
  • Cost structure: equipment and payloads (robots/drones/gas & thermal sensors/mobile lighting), integration and installation, connectivity and edge facilities, local services (installation, training, maintenance), spares and consumables, software.
  • ROI methodology: annual benefit = manual-patrol labor savings + reduced accident/unplanned-stoppages loss (converted) + compliance and insurance optimization; payback = (one-off investment + annual operating cost) ÷ (annual benefit).
  • No pricing figures appear on this page; amounts follow the signed scope of work and formal quotations.
8Certification, data, safety & site risks
  • Certification: explosion-proof certification where applicable; local radio-equipment requirements; local electrical and metrology standards verified item by item.
  • Data: patrol imagery and sensor data belong to the demand side; on-site storage first; cross-border transfer needs compliance review; public display is desensitized.
  • Safety: robot entries into restricted zones must align with the permit-to-work system; fail-safe autonomous return required.
  • Site risks: rainy-season roads, dust on sensor windows, underground connectivity gaps, local power fluctuation.
9Failure & stop conditions
  • Failure: acceptance metrics below the agreed floor in two consecutive rounds without an improvement path; availability below threshold; persistently unstable data links.
  • Stop: site conditions exceeding the equipment safety envelope (e.g. gas concentration beyond the rated range) stop the work immediately; uncontrollable safety risk means withdrawal and review.
10Next steps & boundaries
  • Next steps: demand side provides routes and site conditions → solution shortlist and equipment selection → sign scope of work and acceptance criteria → execute on site.
  • Boundary: for routine patrol and emergency scouting in high-risk mining areas; not an immediate substitute in blasting faces without verified conditions; not a promise of confirmed demand.
  • Upgrade: becomes a Project Blueprint once demand reaches L2.
11Source, verification date & authorization
SourceIndustry knowledge and public evidence (public mining-safety requirements, public industry practices); internal research (industrial thermal-imaging and smart-inspection survey). Verified2026-08-15 (internal survey); 2026-08-30 (blueprint structure finalized). AuthorizationNot applicable — Reference Blueprint from industry knowledge and public evidence; no verified demand-side party; no enterprise-identifiable information.
BP-02

Unmanned Inspection of Hazardous Areas

Reference Blueprint

Scope: hazmat · battery · warehousing · underground space · industrial parks (concentrated validation carrier) | combining robots, drones, sensors, thermal imaging and software

1Problem & current practice
  • Hazmat storage and production zones, battery clusters (manufacturing and storage), large warehouses and underground spaces (utility tunnels, garages) face gas leaks, thermal runaway and early fire signs; today they rely on scheduled manual patrol plus fixed cameras, with thermal anomalies checked by handheld spot measurement — limited coverage and continuity.
  • Night and holiday patrols are thin; sensing devices are siloed without a unified alarm-review and record flow.
  • Internal research (2026-08-15): early thermal-runaway monitoring and explosion-proof patrol in battery clusters is among the most concentrated high-value demand patterns.
2Industry, tasks, conditions & region
  • Industry: hazmat, battery (manufacturing and energy storage), logistics and warehousing, underground-space operation, industrial-park management.
  • Tasks: routine unmanned patrol; continuous gas & thermal monitoring; meter reading; alarm review with human confirmation.
  • Conditions: explosion-protection zones (per-zone verification), battery thermal-runaway risk areas, heat & humidity, no satellite positioning underground, narrow corridors.
  • Region: in Indonesia the industrial park serves as the concentrated validation carrier (generic; the specific park is decided after demand confirmation); domestic benchmark: chemical-park unmanned-inspection policy validation areas.
3Target metrics & business value
  • Upgrade from 1–2 manual rounds per shift to on-demand routine unmanned patrol; gas/thermal alarm latency down to minutes; less labor tied up per route.
  • Value: early detection of thermal-runaway and leak signs lowers major-accident probability; structured patrol records support compliance and insurance; unified review of multi-source sensing.
4Recommended composition & alternatives
  • Main path: explosion-proof inspection robot (wheeled/quadruped) + rail-mounted units for corridors + visible/infrared dual spectrum + gas sensing + edge gateway + patrol platform; drone swarms as a supplement for open tank areas and rooftops.
  • Alternatives: fixed-point-only design (lower input, limited coverage); hybrid "fixed + mobile"; software-first phased path (connect existing cameras and sensors first, add mobile patrol later).
5Product & local delivery requirements
  • Product: explosion-proof rating matched to each zone (verified zone by zone); ingress protection; charging and parking layout; read-only interfaces to existing fire-alarm and access systems.
  • Indonesia delivery: local registered entity or authorized agent for contracting and customs; training and documents in Bahasa Indonesia; rainy-season and archipelago logistics buffers; local spares and remote maintenance channels.
6PoC scope, duration & acceptance
  • Scope: 1–2 representative zones in one park (e.g. one storage corridor + one battery storage area), covering routine patrol, thermal/gas alarms and night patrol.
  • Duration: 4–8 weeks recommended.
  • Acceptance (example caliber): route coverage, alarm latency, false-alarm and miss rates (on calibrated samples), equipment availability, integration completeness with existing systems.
7Cost structure & ROI methodology
  • Cost structure: equipment and payloads, integration and installation, connectivity, local services, spares and consumables, software; itemized when fixed points and mobile units are combined.
  • ROI methodology: annual benefit = labor savings + reduced accident loss (converted) + compliance and insurance optimization; payback = (one-off investment + annual operating cost) ÷ (annual benefit).
  • No pricing figures appear on this page; amounts follow the signed scope of work and formal quotations.
8Certification, data, safety & site risks
  • Certification: explosion-proof certification matched to zone ratings; local radio requirements; local electrical safety standards.
  • Data: video and sensor data belong to the demand side; on-site storage first; public display is desensitized.
  • Safety: permits before entering explosion-protection zones; fail-safe return to base; read-only integration with fire systems, no overriding control.
  • Site risks: entry forbidden when zone rating exceeds equipment suitability; traffic rules for mixed human-machine corridors; battery areas beyond the equipment envelope are no-entry.
9Failure & stop conditions
  • Failure: two rounds below the agreed floor; false alarms that cannot converge; failed explosion-proof suitability verification.
  • Stop: zone rating mismatched with the equipment rating stops entry; uncontrollable safety risk means withdrawal and review.
10Next steps & boundaries
  • Next steps: the park provides zone-rating maps and patrol routes → shortlist and explosion-proof verification → sign scope of work and acceptance criteria → execute on site.
  • Boundary: for routine inspection in hazmat, battery, warehousing, underground and industrial-park settings; does not replace legally required human safety duties; no specific park or enterprise is targeted.
  • Upgrade: becomes a Project Blueprint once demand reaches L2.
11Source, verification date & authorization
SourceIndustry knowledge and public evidence (public hazmat and battery safety requirements, public explosion-proof patrol practices); internal research (thermal-imaging and smart-inspection survey: early thermal-runaway monitoring and explosion-proof patrol in battery clusters as a high-priority demand pattern). Verified2026-08-15 (internal survey); 2026-08-30 (blueprint structure finalized). AuthorizationNot applicable — Reference Blueprint from industry knowledge and public evidence; no verified demand-side party; no enterprise-identifiable information.
BP-03

Natural Disaster & Fire Emergency Response

Reference Blueprint

Scope: disaster reconnaissance · firefighter positioning · communication relay · hazard identification · lighting · supply delivery

1Problem & current practice
  • After earthquakes, floods, volcanic events and urban fires, sites often face broken communications, blocked roads, toxic smoke and heat; response relies on manual reconnaissance, and crews inside rely on shouting and experience for positioning and withdrawal.
  • Night and heavy-smoke visibility is poor; hazard identification lags; delivering small urgent supplies to isolated points is hard.
2Industry, tasks, conditions & region
  • Industry: emergency response, fire services, disaster-mitigation agencies, park and community emergency management.
  • Tasks: disaster reconnaissance; firefighter positioning; communication relay; hazard identification; site lighting; small-supply delivery.
  • Conditions: heat and smoke, wading, uneven rubble terrain, communications down, night operations, strong wind and rain.
  • Region: disaster-prone Indonesian archipelago areas (generic); domestic benchmark: public demonstration scenarios of emergency-management systems for equipment validation.
3Target metrics & business value
  • Faster acquisition of site imagery; higher reach rate of positioning and withdrawal instructions; shorter time to restore on-site communications coverage; better night lighting coverage.
  • Value: lower risk of secondary injuries to responders; better use of the golden rescue window; unified site information for the command post.
4Recommended composition & alternatives
  • Main path: reconnaissance drone (visible + thermal) + ground rescue robot (rubble and stair obstacle-crossing) + personnel positioning beacons and communication terminals + tethered or mesh relay + lighting drone / mobile lighting + small-supply delivery drone + command software.
  • Alternatives: carried-in reconnaissance with fixed relays; phased path — deploy reconnaissance and lighting first, add positioning and delivery later.
5Product & local delivery requirements
  • Product: protection rating with wind and rain resistance; thermal imaging usable through smoke; hot-swappable batteries and fast recharge; portable, fast-deploying configurations.
  • Indonesia delivery: authorization and process alignment with local emergency-response mechanisms; operator training in Bahasa Indonesia; forward-positioned storage and maintenance points; multi-island transport plans.
6PoC scope, duration & acceptance
  • Scope: drill scenarios agreed with local emergency units (1 tabletop exercise + 1 live drill), covering at least three of five subjects: reconnaissance, positioning, relay, lighting, delivery.
  • Duration: 2–6 weeks recommended (subject to drill windows).
  • Acceptance (example caliber): imagery return latency, instruction reach rate, relay coverage radius and endurance, illumination and endurance, delivery precision.
7Cost structure & ROI methodology
  • Cost structure: equipment and payloads, integration and training, communications and spares, local services and maintenance, software.
  • ROI methodology: benefit converted from reduced risk loss and faster response (fewer secondary injuries, shorter handling time); payback = (one-off investment + annual operating cost) ÷ (annual converted benefit).
  • No pricing figures appear on this page; amounts follow the drill service agreement and formal quotations.
8Certification, data, safety & site risks
  • Certification: drone flight compliance (local airspace, registration, flight permits); local radio requirements.
  • Data: disaster-site imagery involves personal privacy and is desensitized before any public use; data belongs to the local command authority.
  • Safety: the local command has precedence on site; equipment operations require site permission; do not occupy crew rescue corridors.
  • Site risks: no-fly in severe weather; smoke effects on optical sensors; frequency interference; limited take-off and landing areas.
9Failure & stop conditions
  • Failure: drill subjects repeatedly below the acceptance floor; environmental suitability (wind, rain, smoke) not met.
  • Stop: immediate stop if the local command judges rescue safety is affected; no launch without airspace or spectrum permission.
10Next steps & boundaries
  • Next steps: talk with local emergency and fire units within their mandate → design the drill → sign the scope of work → execute and review.
  • Boundary: for civilian emergency response and drills only, within lawful authorization; not a replacement for professional rescue forces.
  • Upgrade: becomes a Project Blueprint once demand reaches L2.
11Source, verification date & authorization
SourceIndustry knowledge and public evidence (public disaster-response practices, public emergency-equipment materials); no internal field research yet at publication time, stated as-is. Verified2026-08-30 (blueprint structure finalized; public evidence compiled). AuthorizationNot applicable — Reference Blueprint from industry knowledge and public evidence; no verified demand-side party; no enterprise-identifiable information.
BP-04

Inter-island & Remote-area Low-altitude Transport

Reference Blueprint

Scope: medical supplies · rescue equipment · industrial spares · communication equipment (priority high to low) | urban consumer delivery is NOT a first-phase goal

1Problem & current practice
  • Across a vast archipelago, inter-island transport relies on ferries plus road plus small aircraft; schedules and lead times are limited, and small high-value items (medical supplies, spares) are often delayed waiting for shared sailings.
  • Routes break in bad weather; last-mile transport to remote islands is constrained by jetties and roads; today there is no economical answer for "small batch, high urgency" items.
2Industry, tasks, conditions & region
  • Industry: healthcare and public health, emergency response, industrial operations (mine and energy-site spares), telecom infrastructure maintenance.
  • Tasks: point-to-point low-altitude transport of small items from kilograms to tens of kilograms; priority: medical supplies > rescue equipment > industrial spares > communication equipment; urban consumer delivery is not a first-phase goal.
  • Conditions: maritime humidity and salt spray, strong wind and rain, runway-free vertical take-off and landing, uneven communications coverage.
  • Region: Indonesian inter-island and remote areas (generic; specific routes confirmed per demand); domestic benchmark: public island and mountain feeder-logistics demonstrations to validate operations first.
3Target metrics & business value
  • Shorter delivery time for urgent items versus existing modes; better utilization of weather windows; fewer cut-off days on the last mile; consistently high handover integrity.
  • Value: stronger medical emergency response; shorter waits for production lines and sites waiting on spares; a predictable replenishment rhythm for remote areas.
4Recommended composition & alternatives
  • Main path: long-range VTOL cargo drone + standardized cargo boxes + simple landing points + mission-scheduling and track-management software + weather and airspace information services.
  • Alternatives: "trunk–feeder–last-mile" segmentation in cooperation with small crewed aircraft; start with one fixed route, then scale into a network; connect handover standards with existing logistics networks.
5Product & local delivery requirements
  • Product: airworthiness and local civil-aviation compliance; payload and range matched to the route; salt-spray protection; redundant power and parachute safety options; temperature-controlled boxes for medical items as needed.
  • Indonesia delivery: civil-aviation permits and route approvals (per local regulations); local operations and maintenance teams; landing-point coordination (community and facility authorization); communications and navigation support.
6PoC scope, duration & acceptance
  • Scope: one fixed route (clear endpoints, coordinable airspace), validating the full flow of loading — take-off — cruise — landing — handover, plus bad-weather contingency plans.
  • Duration: 6–12 weeks recommended (including approvals and weather-window waiting).
  • Acceptance (example caliber): on-time rate, mission success rate, payload and range attainment, handover integrity, safety incidents (target: zero).
7Cost structure & ROI methodology
  • Cost structure: aircraft and cargo boxes, ground facilities, operations crew and maintenance, insurance and compliance, software and information services.
  • ROI methodology: benefit converted from time savings (less delay loss, shorter downtime and stock-out waits) + comparison with existing transport modes; payback = (one-off investment + annual operating cost) ÷ (annual converted benefit).
  • No pricing figures appear on this page; amounts follow the pilot service agreement and formal quotations.
8Certification, data, safety & site risks
  • Certification: local civil-aviation airworthiness and operating permits; aircraft registration; operator qualifications; item-by-item verification of medical-transport requirements.
  • Data: track and mission data managed per agreements between operator and demand side; medical-item information handled per privacy requirements.
  • Safety: avoid densely populated areas; bad-weather no-fly standards; packaging and two-person handover verification.
  • Site risks: uncertain weather windows, long airspace-coordination cycles, landing-point site constraints.
9Failure & stop conditions
  • Failure: on-time or mission-success rates repeatedly below the agreed floor; handover integrity not met.
  • Stop: no flight without permits; no flight beyond weather limits; a major safety issue terminates the pilot for review.
10Next steps & boundaries
  • Next steps: demand side defines candidate routes and cargo types → initial airspace and landing-point checks → solution design → sign the scope of work → pilot operation.
  • Boundary: urban consumer delivery excluded in phase one; civilian logistics use only; all flights subject to local civil-aviation regulations.
  • Upgrade: becomes a Project Blueprint once demand reaches L2.
11Source, verification date & authorization
SourceIndustry knowledge and public evidence (public archipelago-logistics materials, public low-altitude-economy and feeder-logistics practices); no internal field research yet at publication time, stated as-is. Verified2026-08-30 (blueprint structure finalized; public evidence compiled). AuthorizationNot applicable — Reference Blueprint from industry knowledge and public evidence; no verified demand-side party; no enterprise-identifiable information.
BP-05

High-Threshold Embodied AI Applications in Europe

Reference Blueprint

Scope: warehouse & logistics automation · companion care & safe patient transfer · agricultural picking & carrying (three task lines; public cases as capability reference only)

1Scenario problem & current practice
  • Warehousing, elder care and controlled-environment agriculture in Europe all face high labor costs, staffing shortages and compliance pressure; flexibility falls short during peak shifts, night operations and narrow harvest windows, and capacity swings hit fulfillment and revenue directly.
  • Order picking and replenishment rely on people walking long distances between racks; care institutions depend on manual nursing, with patient-transfer tasks carrying a high occupational-injury risk; fruit picking depends on seasonal labor under tight maturity windows.
  • Public cases show that such robots can already run inside existing facilities; vendor-reported field data, however, cannot be taken directly as acceptance metrics for a new site.
2Industry, tasks, conditions & region
  • Industry: third-party logistics and retail warehousing; elder-care and medical institutions; controlled-environment agriculture (e.g. raised-bed strawberry greenhouses and tunnels with defined harvest windows).
  • Tasks (three lines): warehousing — tote handling, picking/replenishment and zone-to-zone transport; care — companionship and light delivery, with safe patient transfer verified separately under a higher bar; agriculture — ripe-fruit recognition, selective picking and crate loading/transport.
  • Conditions: existing warehouse layouts and fire-egress constraints; privacy and staff-presence requirements in care settings; greenhouse humidity, row spacing and lighting variation affecting recognition and manipulation.
  • Region: Europe (generic; no specific country, enterprise or site named); domestic benchmark scenarios can validate similar conditions first.
3Target metrics & business value
  • Warehousing accepts "complete order lines" as the core metric: pick completion and error rates met, fewer manual interventions and stoppages, throughput held during peak shifts.
  • Care starts with low-contact tasks (companionship, reminders, light delivery) to free nurses from non-nursing chores; transfer remains human-led — the goal is reducing occupational injury, not replacing nursing judgment.
  • Agriculture is accepted in kilograms of qualified fruit in crates, not nominal output; missed picks and manual re-picking costs decline.
  • Value: easier recruiting, stable peak capacity, and digitalized records of field operations.
4Recommended composition & alternatives
  • Warehousing: tote-handling robots/AMRs + end effectors with vision + task orchestration integrated with WES/WMS + manual takeover on exceptions; prioritize co-working with existing conveyors over reconstruction.
  • Care: companionship/light-delivery robots (dialogue, reminders, delivery) first; transfer equipment must keep the caregiver in control of the process, with abnormal stop and emergency lowering verified.
  • Agriculture: soft grippers + robotic arm + mobile base + ripeness recognition (variety, occlusion, lighting, fruit damage) coordinated with crate loading and carrying.
  • Shared method: task card → local partner → authorized PoC; do one workflow end to end, and never trade single-robot speed for whole-order-line acceptance.
5Product & local delivery requirements
  • Product: equipment must fit existing facilities — fire lanes and safety segregation in warehouses, door widths and elevators in care buildings, row spacing and terrain on farms; abnormal-stop and fail-safe features required.
  • Software: integration with WMS/WES, care records and scheduling, and farm management systems; complete task logs and manual-takeover records.
  • Local delivery: complete CE conformity documentation; local integration, training and documentation; spares availability and fault-response time; insurance arrangements.
  • Vendor-reported multi-site operation serves as capability reference only and must be re-verified site by site.
6PoC scope, duration & acceptance
  • Warehousing: G0 — warehouse-zone data, interface access, owner and budget authorization; G1 — offline simulation and partial workflow integration; G2 — covering normal and peak shifts over 8–12 weeks.
  • Care: companionship/light delivery 6–8 weeks, simulated users first then an approved cohort; safe transfer 8–12 weeks, G2 restricted to approved persons with caregivers supervising throughout.
  • Agriculture: baseline of yield, labor and losses first; G1 — machine adaptation and simulated picking to confirm the safety envelope; G2 — restricted to one variety and defined rows, conclusions drawn within a single harvest window (6–10 weeks).
  • Acceptance caliber: warehousing — completion, errors, manual interventions and true staff hours; care — safety incidents and manual takeovers; agriculture — qualified kilograms/hour in crates and manual re-picking cost.
7Cost structure & ROI methodology
  • Cost structure: equipment and payloads, integration and installation, software integration, local labor and training, insurance, spares and consumables, long-term licensing and maintenance; the PoC budget is estimated by these line items — no figures on this page.
  • ROI (warehousing): payback is driven by paid-labor-hour savings — simple payback = total investment ÷ annual net savings, where annual net savings = truly eliminated paid hours × hourly rate − annual O&M; whether the PoC cost is deducted is stated separately.
  • Care and agriculture do not share one formula: care is measured conservatively against realistically substitutable hours — savings can be small and payback stretches accordingly; agriculture is measured by qualified kilograms and net saving per kilogram, highly sensitive to yield.
  • All figures are planning assumptions, not quotations; amounts follow the signed PoC scope of work and formal quotations.
8Certification, data, safety & site risks
  • Certification: warehousing and agriculture verify applicable machinery law, the CE conformity-assessment route and risk documentation — CE is not a single catch-all claim; the route depends on the product's intended use.
  • Medical: devices involving patient transfer or rehabilitation intended uses verify EU MDR intended purpose, classification and clinical-evidence requirements.
  • Data & AI: images, voice and health data are checked for a lawful basis under GDPR; AI Act applicability and access permissions verified; AI bears no final responsibility for nursing decisions.
  • Site risks: retrofit constraints in existing facilities, vulnerability of care populations, harvest-window/schedule mismatch, local service responsiveness.
9Failure & stop conditions
  • Failure: acceptance metrics below the agreed floor in consecutive rounds with no improvement path; safety incidents or manual takeovers above threshold; persistently unstable interfaces or data links.
  • Transfer special clause: any patient-safety risk or unadaptable nursing workflow stops the work and the equipment is withdrawn first.
  • Stop: site conditions beyond the equipment safety envelope stop the work immediately; uncontrollable safety risk means withdrawal and review.
10Next steps & boundaries
  • Next steps: obtain three written task cards — warehouse (process owner, order lines, WMS interface, labor cost); care institution (eligible users, SOPs, data and clinical owner); farm (variety, harvest window, labor baseline, maintenance team).
  • The PoC team is formed only after written tasks, budget and site authorization are in place.
  • Boundary: this is a direction release and a call for solutions, not evidence that any European customer has ordered; public cases serve as capability reference only, and European sites and budgets remain to be verified.
  • Vendors' promotional payback claims (e.g. "payback within a year") are excluded from this blueprint; the blueprint becomes a Project Blueprint once demand reaches L2.
11Source, verification date & authorization
SourceCorporate public disclosures and public reporting (public case of a large European IT-services company's warehouse; public report of an EU research institute's companion-robot field test in a care home; public case of a transfer-assist robot at a Danish university hospital; public case of a strawberry-picking robot on a UK farm). Verified2026-09-18. AuthorizationPublic cases serve as capability reference only; no enterprise-identifiable information; European sites and budgets pending verification; not a promise of confirmed demand.
SP-01

Nearshore & Port Waters Intelligent Operations (Marine Special Blueprint)

Special Blueprint (Solution Call)

Scope: sea-surface floating-debris cleaning (M-A) · water distress-assist rescue (M-B) · enclosed harbor basins, scenic waters and controlled nearshore areas

1Scenario problem & current practice
  • Floating debris in harbor basins, scenic waters and nearshore areas is mostly removed by crewed cleaning vessels on fixed schedules; detection relies on patrols with limited coverage and frequency, and landing, sorting and disposal after collection are often the bottleneck of the loop.
  • Response to persons in distress on the water relies on shore lookout and phone alarms; detection weakens at night and in bad weather, and the time gap between floatation-device delivery and human arrival is the critical risk.
  • Release boundary: exhibitors/candidate solution providers are not proof of demand; this blueprint becomes a Demand Blueprint only after a water area, an owner and budget authorization are secured.
2Industry, tasks, conditions & region
  • Industry: port and water-area management; scenic and waterfront operations; water-safety and rescue organizations.
  • Task packages: M-A sea-surface cleaning — detect → collect → land, sort and dispose; M-B water distress-assist rescue — detect → locate → deliver (or approach) → human takeover.
  • Conditions: tide, wind and navigation-channel constraints; salt fog, anti-corrosion and waterproofing requirements; the first phase targets relatively controlled waters such as harbor basins and scenic waters; oil spills, chemical leaks and open-sea search & rescue are out of scope for round one.
  • Region: generic; no specific water area named; similar controlled domestic waters can validate first.
3Target metrics & business value
  • M-A: improved detection and coverage of floating debris; collection work recorded by weight, category and disposal destination; unit operating cost made auditable.
  • M-B: a shorter chain from alarm to confirmation, equipment arrival and human takeover; AI only provides cues — the rescue commander and human takeover are always present.
  • Value: targeted release of cleaning and watch-keeping labor, auditable records for compliance and insurance; rescue assistance is positioned as an enhancement of the existing rescue system, not a replacement.
4Recommended composition & alternatives
  • M-A: surface cleaning robots/USVs (collision avoidance, return-on-signal-loss, endurance and payload limits) + shore-based video or drone detection + task logs; dock support for launch/recovery, charging and spares, plus landing transport and compliant disposal.
  • M-B: shore-based monitoring and drones for detection + remote-controlled rescue floats or surface rescue robots for delivery/approach + shipboard systems such as man-overboard beacons, alarms and positioning; dispatch only after the commander re-confirms.
  • Shared foundation: a common water-area map, communications and task records; purchaser, watch-keeping responsibility and safety metrics confirmed separately.
  • Candidate equipment listed desensitized: e.g. a domestic vendor's marine-grade remote-controlled rescue ring (salt-fog-resistant design, positioning/distress function) and surface rescue robot; sea state, control range and certification documents verified per target water.
5Product & local delivery requirements
  • Equipment: salt-fog resistance and ingress protection, communication reliability, return-on-signal-loss and runaway handling are hard requirements; certification documents of rescue equipment verified item by item for the target water.
  • Software: debris recognition and distribution maps, routes and task logs, manual-takeover interface; monitoring and alerts cannot automatically declare a rescue — recognition results require human review.
  • Local delivery: water-area access permits and navigation safety rules; dock support (launch/recovery, charging, maintenance); operators and insurance; waste transport and disposal qualifications.
  • Participating companies submit cases from similar waters with itemized responsibilities per task; no one is presumed to carry the entire capability chain by default.
6PoC scope, duration & acceptance
  • M-A: G0 — water area, trial navigation, shore landing and insurance authorization; G1 — survey of hotspots and the existing cleaning-cost baseline; G2 — record about 20 planned operating days within 6–8 weeks.
  • M-A acceptance: coverage and recognition accuracy, weighing and sorting records, change in labor hours, downtime and exception handling.
  • M-B: G0 — rescue command authority, trial navigation/flight authorization and SOPs; G1 — drills with dummy manikins and floats in calm water, including runaway handling; G2 — at least 20 simulated dispatches in approved waters.
  • M-B acceptance: detection rate, false alarms and location error; segmented times from alarm to confirmation/arrival/takeover; covered waters and availability; loss-of-link and severe-weather withdrawal. Real persons in distress are never PoC test subjects.
7Cost structure & ROI methodology
  • Cost structure: surface platforms and payloads, sensing and software, dock support facilities, local services (operators, insurance, maintenance), waste landing transport and disposal; M-B additionally includes drill and watch-keeping costs.
  • ROI (M-A): verify the paid cleaning costs that can actually be cancelled, not the headline total — annual net savings = truly eliminated labor cost − annual O&M; simple payback = total investment ÷ annual net savings; whether the PoC cost is deducted is stated separately.
  • M-B has no financial ROI: the value of life is never converted into financial return; budget is judged by itemized procurement, operation and service fees, with safety and response metrics taking precedence.
  • No pricing figures appear on this page; amounts follow the signed PoC scope of work and formal quotations.
8Certification, data, safety & site risks
  • Certification: jurisdictional requirements for radio equipment and vessels/drones verified item by item; rescue-equipment certifications re-checked; insurance and responsible parties traceable.
  • Data: water-area imagery involves public-space surveillance and personal privacy and is processed under local law; task logs belong to the demand side and public display is desensitized.
  • Safety: for M-B the rescue commander is present throughout with human backup — AI only provides cues and robots never promise to rescue on their own; oil and chemical pollution requires separate professional response plans.
  • Site risks: severe-weather and sea-state windows, navigation-channel conflicts, communication blind spots, corrosion and biofouling.
9Failure & stop conditions
  • Failure: detection and collection metrics below the agreed floor in consecutive rounds; low availability or frequent failed return-on-signal-loss; no improvement in segmented drill-dispatch times.
  • Stop: sea state or weather beyond the equipment/SOP safety envelope stops work immediately; any personnel-safety risk in M-B suspends the drill and triggers a review.
  • Out of scope, then stop: tasks extending beyond controlled nearshore waters (open-sea search & rescue, oil and chemical response) are not executed in this round.
10Next steps & boundaries
  • Next steps: one water area, one task card — lock a well-managed harbor basin or nearshore water first, interview the cleaning purchaser and the rescue commander separately, and set the PoC caliber once baselines, authorization and budget are in hand.
  • Four-party alignment: water-area manager (permits and rules); task purchaser (cleaning and rescue budgets assessed separately); local operator (maintenance, insurance, watch-keeping, disposal); equipment consortium (field evidence, compliance, itemized costs).
  • Boundary: this Special Blueprint is a call for solutions and a direction release; no unconfirmed overseas procurement demands are published; the platform organizes tasks and joint responses but does not replace licensed operators or rescue command.
  • Upgrade: becomes a Demand Blueprint once the water area, owner and budget authorization are secured.
11Source, verification date & authorization
SourcePublic disclosures by port authorities and institutions (public case of floating-debris management at a European port; public reporting on a surface-cleaning project in a Caspian bay; public retrospective on a river interception project in a Southeast Asian city; public incident records and coastal-monitoring trial reporting by an Australian water-safety rescue organization). Verified2026-09-17. AuthorizationPublic cases serve as capability reference only; no enterprise-identifiable information; no water area is presumed suitable on this basis; not a promise of confirmed demand.
Submit a scenario to discuss a deployment path
Free to submit; once the related demand reaches L2, the Reference Blueprint is upgraded to a Project Blueprint with a public desensitized version.
All content on this page is compiled from industry knowledge and public evidence; the page covers six scenario directions: BP-01 to BP-05 are labeled "Reference Blueprint" and SP-01 within water-based intelligent equipment is labeled "Solution Call". No enterprise-identifiable information, contact details, budget or pricing figures are included. Blueprint structure and disclosure discipline follow the platform's shared 11-section template; regional delivery conditions follow documents confirmed by both project parties.
获取蓝图与案例更新Get Blueprint & Case Updates

接收国内外最新场景落地蓝图拆解与案例更新；免费订阅，随时一键退订。通知服务开通前，我们会先请您确认邮箱。Receive the latest scenario blueprint breakdowns and case updates, domestic and international; free to subscribe, unsubscribe anytime. Before notifications go live, we will ask you to confirm your email first.

关注地区（选填，可多选）Regions (optional, multi-select)

友吉智汇（YouJi Nexus）聚焦具身智能与低空应用，连接国内外场景需求、技术能力与本地交付伙伴，推动方案适配、应用验证与落地协同。

YouJi Nexus focuses on embodied AI and low-altitude applications, connecting application needs, technology capabilities and local implementation partners in China and overseas to support solution adaptation, validation and deployment coordination.

商务合作 / Business enquiries：contact@youjinexus.com ｜ 业务合作 / Work with Us

关于友吉智汇 / About YouJi Nexus点击展开更多联系信息 / Tap to expand contact details

直接联系 / Direct contact

联系人微信WeChat contact
友吉智汇联系人微信二维码 / YouJi Nexus WeChat contact QR code

添加时请备注：机构名称＋合作事项
Please include your organization and enquiry.

WhatsApp业务账号WhatsApp Business
友吉智汇WhatsApp业务账号二维码 / YouJi Nexus WhatsApp Business QR code

发送机构、国家／地区及合作需求
Send your organization, location and enquiry.

可用对应应用扫码联系；点击二维码可查看并保存原图。
Scan with the relevant app, or open a QR code to view and save the original image.

服务对象

面向场景需求方、科技解决方案企业、集成商与本地交付及支持伙伴，以及有招商、考察调研或产业合作需求的政府、园区和产业机构。

工作方式

从具体任务出发，通过产业研究、场景发现、现场调研与供需对接，梳理任务、现有基线、工况、能力组合、验证指标和责任分工，形成可核验的场景蓝图，并协同推进方案适配与应用验证。已有具体需求的参与者，可通过平台选择场景诊断，咨询PoC（概念验证）与租赁，或提出企业调研、科技场景考察与对接需求。

三个入口

  • 场景机会 — 发现国内外需求线索、方案征集与项目合作机会。
  • 场景蓝图 — 理解任务拆解、方案思路、验证方法与适用条件。
  • 场景对接与活动 — 通过现场调研、供需对接和专题交流，发现需求并推动合作。

事实与服务边界

平台资料按来源与阶段区分公开信息、企业披露、研究判断、参考蓝图及已核实的项目进展。合作线索与参考蓝图用于进一步核验；具体需求、预算和场景授权由相关参与方确认。方案适配、验证及交付协同的服务地区、范围、费用和责任，以实际核验与各方约定为准。

联系与交流

商务邮箱：contact@youjinexus.com。微信公众号：搜索“友吉智汇”，阅读方法解读、产业观察、活动与可公开的实践进展。联系时请说明机构与地区、具体任务或技术能力、希望推进的下一步，以及计划时间与预算范围。

Who we work with

We work with application owners, technology solution providers, system integrators, local implementation and support partners, and government bodies, industrial parks and industry organizations seeking investment promotion, study visits or industrial cooperation.

How we work

Starting with a specific task, we use industry research, application discovery, site studies and business matching to clarify tasks, current performance baselines, operating conditions, capability combinations, validation criteria and responsibilities. We organize this information into verifiable scenario blueprints and coordinate solution adaptation and application validation. Participants with specific needs can use the platform to access scenario assessment, enquire about proof-of-concept (PoC) validation and equipment rental, or request enterprise research and technology site visits and business matching.

Three entry points

  • Scenario Opportunities — Explore demand leads, calls for solutions and project cooperation opportunities in China and overseas.
  • Blueprints & Case Studies — Understand task breakdowns, solution approaches, validation methods and conditions for application.
  • Scenario Matching & Events — Discover needs and advance cooperation through site studies, business matching and focused industry discussions.

Information and service scope

Platform materials distinguish public information, company disclosures, research assessments, reference blueprints and verified project progress by source and stage. Cooperation leads and reference blueprints support further verification; specific needs, budgets and site authorization must be confirmed by the relevant parties. The locations, scope, fees and responsibilities for solution adaptation, validation and implementation coordination are subject to verification and agreement among the parties.

Contact and updates

Business enquiries: contact@youjinexus.com. WeChat Official Account: search for “友吉智汇” for methods, industry analysis, events and practice updates that can be made public. When contacting us, please include your organization and location, task or technical capabilities, intended next step, timeline and budget range.